Greetings fellow Fringers!
Yes, I’m back on the subject of Reviews again. I did warn you, didn’t I?! Thanks to those of you who sent feedback or otherwise made their feelings known following my last visits to this subject. At that time, I deliberately wrote BEFORE the reviews for our shows had come out. There was good reason for this: it would prevent me being labelled the “embittered artist” who had had bad reviews. As soon as that happens, people use it as an excuse to ignore anything the “embittered artist” might have to say.
Actually, it didn’t quite work. One person still tagged me thus, even though there had been no reviews, and I certainly wasn’t embittered! However…now that the reviews are out, how do I feel? Well….fine, to be honest! In fact, the reviews have been so incredibly diverse (for both shows), that it only goes to reinforce the fact that it is all OPINION.
OK, so there a four papers in Edmonton which seem to give good coverage to the Fringe. The Sun seems to have taken more of a back seat these days. The excellent Colin Maclean is doing his best, but can only see a limited number of shows. So, no reviews in The Sun for us this year.
As for the rest, well…for “Full of Sound and Fury’ we got 2.5 stars from the Journal. So that means the show is mediochre. But wait…we got 5 stars and “Pick of the Fringe” from Vue Weekly. So that means the show is excellent, right? Good, bad, good, bad. 2.5 stars. 5 stars. But now let’s look at “Red Wine and Canvas”. Vue Weekly gave us 1 star, and the Journal gave us 5 stars. Awful, excellent, awful, excellent? What on earth does it all mean?
It means….people are human. Even reviewers. They have opinions and differing tastes, just like the rest of us. Look a little further. The Online “Edmonton Journal” allows people to comment on the reviews. “Full of Sound and Fury” has received some amazing support there, very positive indeed. But “Red Wine and Canvas” has had someone completely disagreeing with the 5 star review, and finding the show “painful to sit through”. Opinions, all opinions.
Then look at the 30 second reviews. More opinions. It’s great.
Hats off to the Journal for allowing the public to post alternative reviews. It shows a healthy willingness to be contradicted. Likewise, the 30 second reviews really give the public chance to have their say. But be careful: these Forums (Fora?? Forae?) can be misused. It is not unknown for Artists and Companies to post their own reviews, extolling themselves to the heavens. My word of advice here is…DON”T. The open public forum is a wonderful tool which has been created to allow ordinary people to voice their opinions. It’s not there for Artists to advertise, stroke their own egos, or rail at perceived injustice. If the system is abused too much, it will be removed, and we will all be the worse off for it.
Needless to say, Dreamscape has never made up its own reviews…but I know of companies who do, including an British company who fabricates both reviews and star ratings. Egos, always egos.
So, back to those reviews. Some have been good, some have been bad. In an audience of 140 you’re unlikely to delight every single person. Equally, you’re unlikely to disappoint every single person. People are different….and thank goodness for that, or every show would be working to the same formula.
I don’t object to any of the words written in any of the reviews of our shows. But yes, I still do object to the “star” system. A review is an opinion, but by giving it a number, we somehow turn it into a “FACT”. But Art really isn’t about facts. It’s about abstracts. Isn’t that its beauty? Let’s leave the facts to the Accountants.
A la prochaine!
FERNANDO